<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (12) TMI 325 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=95253</link>
    <description>Intermediate goods captively consumed in manufacturing TV glass shells cleared to an exporter against a CT-2 certificate were not denied captive-consumption exemption under Notification No. 67/95-C.E. merely because the final products moved under the export procedure. The proviso excluding inputs used in exempt or nil-rate final products did not apply, as export-related clearance under the procedure did not by itself make the final goods exempt from duty or chargeable to nil rate of duty in law. The captive-consumption exemption remained available, and the related duty demand and penalty were unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 14 Dec 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Dec 2011 12:04:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=132312" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (12) TMI 325 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=95253</link>
      <description>Intermediate goods captively consumed in manufacturing TV glass shells cleared to an exporter against a CT-2 certificate were not denied captive-consumption exemption under Notification No. 67/95-C.E. merely because the final products moved under the export procedure. The proviso excluding inputs used in exempt or nil-rate final products did not apply, as export-related clearance under the procedure did not by itself make the final goods exempt from duty or chargeable to nil rate of duty in law. The captive-consumption exemption remained available, and the related duty demand and penalty were unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Dec 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=95253</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>