<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (12) TMI 311 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=95241</link>
    <description>Rectification under section 35C(2) of the Central Excise Act is limited to mistakes apparent from the record existing when the Tribunal passed its order. A subsequent Supreme Court pronouncement does not retrospectively create an apparent mistake in an earlier final order and cannot support rectification. Consequently, an application founded solely on a later Supreme Court decision is not maintainable and must be rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 01 Dec 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Dec 2011 11:32:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=132300" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (12) TMI 311 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=95241</link>
      <description>Rectification under section 35C(2) of the Central Excise Act is limited to mistakes apparent from the record existing when the Tribunal passed its order. A subsequent Supreme Court pronouncement does not retrospectively create an apparent mistake in an earlier final order and cannot support rectification. Consequently, an application founded solely on a later Supreme Court decision is not maintainable and must be rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Dec 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=95241</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>