<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (11) TMI 492 - CEGAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=95232</link>
    <description>Denial of cross-examination of the Customs officer who examined and permitted export of the consignments was treated as a breach of natural justice, because that evidence was material to determine whether the goods had been examined and exported on the relevant date. The confiscation, penalty and rejection of drawback claims could not be sustained on the existing record, and the proper course was to set aside the adjudication and remand the matter for de novo consideration after granting cross-examination and hearing.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 Nov 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Dec 2011 10:39:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=132291" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (11) TMI 492 - CEGAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=95232</link>
      <description>Denial of cross-examination of the Customs officer who examined and permitted export of the consignments was treated as a breach of natural justice, because that evidence was material to determine whether the goods had been examined and exported on the relevant date. The confiscation, penalty and rejection of drawback claims could not be sustained on the existing record, and the proper course was to set aside the adjudication and remand the matter for de novo consideration after granting cross-examination and hearing.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Nov 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=95232</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>