https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=95231 The High Court directed the Tribunal to reexamine the Stay Order, emphasizing a prima facie opinion suffices for a stay application. The appellant argued duty demands were not time-barred, citing compliance with classification lists. Financial hardship was claimed, but the Tribunal found the duty demand justified, citing suppression of facts. The Tribunal upheld the stay order, directing the duty deposit within a specified timeframe, considering the appellant's financial standing. en-us Fri, 17 Nov 2000 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 09 Dec 2011 10:37:44 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=95231 The High Court directed the Tribunal to reexamine the Stay Order, emphasizing a prima facie opinion suffices for a stay application. The appellant argued duty demands were not time-barred, citing compliance with classification lists. Financial hardship was claimed, but the Tribunal found the duty demand justified, citing suppression of facts. The Tribunal upheld the stay order, directing the duty deposit within a specified timeframe, considering the appellant's financial standing. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 17 Nov 2000 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=95231