<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (10) TMI 438 - CEGAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=95198</link>
    <description>Clubbing of clearances to deny Small Scale Industry exemption requires consideration of the applicable binding Section 37B direction; failure to address that direction requires reconsideration of the exemption denial. A unit treated as sham, facade or dummy cannot simultaneously be assessed as an independent manufacturer, rendering such a duty demand unsustainable. Invocation of Rule 9(2) read with Section 11A for alleged clandestine removal requires a clear finding of contravention, particularly where duty-paying documents accompanied intercepted goods. The impugned order was set aside and remanded for fresh adjudication.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 10 Oct 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2011 16:16:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=132257" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (10) TMI 438 - CEGAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=95198</link>
      <description>Clubbing of clearances to deny Small Scale Industry exemption requires consideration of the applicable binding Section 37B direction; failure to address that direction requires reconsideration of the exemption denial. A unit treated as sham, facade or dummy cannot simultaneously be assessed as an independent manufacturer, rendering such a duty demand unsustainable. Invocation of Rule 9(2) read with Section 11A for alleged clandestine removal requires a clear finding of contravention, particularly where duty-paying documents accompanied intercepted goods. The impugned order was set aside and remanded for fresh adjudication.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Oct 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=95198</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>