<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (10) TMI 432 - CEGAT,  CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=95192</link>
    <description>Refund of unutilised Modvat credit under Rule 57F(13) was treated as a substantive entitlement, and the quarterly filing condition in the notification as a procedural safeguard. A mere departure from the prescribed filing manner did not justify denial of refund where there was no allegation of revenue loss, misuse, or prejudice to the Revenue. The procedural lapse was therefore not fatal to the claim, and the refund benefit remained available when the input credit could not otherwise be utilised for home consumption.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 03 Oct 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2011 16:03:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=132251" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (10) TMI 432 - CEGAT,  CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=95192</link>
      <description>Refund of unutilised Modvat credit under Rule 57F(13) was treated as a substantive entitlement, and the quarterly filing condition in the notification as a procedural safeguard. A mere departure from the prescribed filing manner did not justify denial of refund where there was no allegation of revenue loss, misuse, or prejudice to the Revenue. The procedural lapse was therefore not fatal to the claim, and the refund benefit remained available when the input credit could not otherwise be utilised for home consumption.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Oct 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=95192</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>