<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (10) TMI 431 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=95191</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal by remanding the case for expert assessment to determine the classification of the imported machine as a Tool Room Precision Coordinate Jig Boring Machine or Universal Milling machine. The expert evaluation by a nominee from CMTI would be binding on both parties, with other issues like imported parts assessment and potential under-valuation left for the Commissioner to address during fresh adjudication.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 03 Oct 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2011 16:03:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=132250" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (10) TMI 431 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=95191</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal by remanding the case for expert assessment to determine the classification of the imported machine as a Tool Room Precision Coordinate Jig Boring Machine or Universal Milling machine. The expert evaluation by a nominee from CMTI would be binding on both parties, with other issues like imported parts assessment and potential under-valuation left for the Commissioner to address during fresh adjudication.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Oct 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=95191</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>