https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=95177 Where stay petitions had been heard and orders reserved, the Revenue was expected to wait for the Tribunal's ruling before initiating coercive recovery. Attachment notices issued under Section 142 of the Customs Act, 1962 were treated as inappropriate during that interval, because recovery action should not proceed while stay relief remained pending decision. The attachment orders dated 8-9-2000 were stayed, and the Revenue was directed to refrain from further recovery steps until the stay order became available. en-us Tue, 12 Sep 2000 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 08 Dec 2011 15:08:51 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=95177 Where stay petitions had been heard and orders reserved, the Revenue was expected to wait for the Tribunal's ruling before initiating coercive recovery. Attachment notices issued under Section 142 of the Customs Act, 1962 were treated as inappropriate during that interval, because recovery action should not proceed while stay relief remained pending decision. The attachment orders dated 8-9-2000 were stayed, and the Revenue was directed to refrain from further recovery steps until the stay order became available. Case-Laws Customs Tue, 12 Sep 2000 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=95177