https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=95166 A container-related cargo claim depending on disputed facts and alleged abandonment of goods was held unsuitable for writ adjudication because it required evidence and no contractual privity was shown with the shipping company or Port Trust. The Court stated that such a dispute should be pursued through civil remedies rather than summary writ proceedings. The reference to Section 62(1) of the Major Port Trusts Act, 1963 did not change that result on the facts presented, and the dismissal of the writ petition was upheld. en-us Wed, 05 Apr 2000 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 08 Dec 2011 14:20:26 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=95166 A container-related cargo claim depending on disputed facts and alleged abandonment of goods was held unsuitable for writ adjudication because it required evidence and no contractual privity was shown with the shipping company or Port Trust. The Court stated that such a dispute should be pursued through civil remedies rather than summary writ proceedings. The reference to Section 62(1) of the Major Port Trusts Act, 1963 did not change that result on the facts presented, and the dismissal of the writ petition was upheld. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 05 Apr 2000 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=95166