https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=95159 An application under Rule 41 of the CEGAT (Procedure) Rules seeking restraint against auction of seized goods was held premature because no notice or communication had been received from the Department indicating any impending auction. The applicants had complied with the earlier deposit direction, but in the absence of a live or threatened auction action, injunctive relief was not ripe for consideration. The request was therefore dismissed at the threshold, and no substantive relief was granted. en-us Tue, 12 Dec 2000 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 08 Dec 2011 13:03:25 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=95159 An application under Rule 41 of the CEGAT (Procedure) Rules seeking restraint against auction of seized goods was held premature because no notice or communication had been received from the Department indicating any impending auction. The applicants had complied with the earlier deposit direction, but in the absence of a live or threatened auction action, injunctive relief was not ripe for consideration. The request was therefore dismissed at the threshold, and no substantive relief was granted. Case-Laws Customs Tue, 12 Dec 2000 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=95159