<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (12) TMI 272 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=95144</link>
    <description>Rule 22 of the Customs, Excise &amp; Gold (Control) Appellate Tribunal (Procedure) Rules, 1982 requires an appeal by a company in winding up to abate unless the official liquidator applies to continue it. Where no such application is made, the appeal cannot proceed and stands abated. The rule places responsibility on the official liquidator to seek continuance of pending appellate proceedings after winding up.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 01 Dec 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2011 12:31:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=132203" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (12) TMI 272 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=95144</link>
      <description>Rule 22 of the Customs, Excise &amp; Gold (Control) Appellate Tribunal (Procedure) Rules, 1982 requires an appeal by a company in winding up to abate unless the official liquidator applies to continue it. Where no such application is made, the appeal cannot proceed and stands abated. The rule places responsibility on the official liquidator to seek continuance of pending appellate proceedings after winding up.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Dec 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=95144</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>