https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=95138 Section 6(1) of the Cinematograph Act was held unconstitutional because it enabled the Central Government to call for the record of an Appellate Tribunal's final quasi-judicial decision and make such order as it thought fit. The Court treated this power as a form of review or revision by the Executive over a tribunal constituted with judicial expertise, which was inconsistent with the rule of law and the constitutional scheme. Executive interference could not be justified on law and order grounds. The provision was therefore invalid, and the tribunal's determination was affirmed as final and binding on the Executive. en-us Tue, 28 Nov 2000 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 22 Jun 2016 14:11:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=95138 Section 6(1) of the Cinematograph Act was held unconstitutional because it enabled the Central Government to call for the record of an Appellate Tribunal's final quasi-judicial decision and make such order as it thought fit. The Court treated this power as a form of review or revision by the Executive over a tribunal constituted with judicial expertise, which was inconsistent with the rule of law and the constitutional scheme. Executive interference could not be justified on law and order grounds. The provision was therefore invalid, and the tribunal's determination was affirmed as final and binding on the Executive. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 28 Nov 2000 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=95138