<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (11) TMI 454 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=95134</link>
    <description>Prima facie entitlement to Modvat credit on finger tips was treated as arguable, and the alternative claim that the items qualified as capital goods was also noted. On that assessment, complete waiver of pre-deposit of duty and penalty was not granted. Instead, only a conditional partial waiver was allowed for hearing the appeal, with a direction to deposit Rs. 50,000 within six weeks.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 Nov 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2011 11:50:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=132193" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (11) TMI 454 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=95134</link>
      <description>Prima facie entitlement to Modvat credit on finger tips was treated as arguable, and the alternative claim that the items qualified as capital goods was also noted. On that assessment, complete waiver of pre-deposit of duty and penalty was not granted. Instead, only a conditional partial waiver was allowed for hearing the appeal, with a direction to deposit Rs. 50,000 within six weeks.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Nov 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=95134</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>