https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=95133 In a classification dispute, the Tribunal treated the stay-order pre-deposit as requiring payment in cash or through PLA, not a debit in RG 23-A Part II. Debit through Modvat account was therefore not accepted as proper compliance with the pre-deposit direction. The Tribunal granted the appellants two weeks to make the required deposit, and warned that failure to do so would result in withdrawal of the stay order and expose the appeal to dismissal. en-us Mon, 27 Nov 2000 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 08 Dec 2011 11:49:11 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=95133 In a classification dispute, the Tribunal treated the stay-order pre-deposit as requiring payment in cash or through PLA, not a debit in RG 23-A Part II. Debit through Modvat account was therefore not accepted as proper compliance with the pre-deposit direction. The Tribunal granted the appellants two weeks to make the required deposit, and warned that failure to do so would result in withdrawal of the stay order and expose the appeal to dismissal. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 27 Nov 2000 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=95133