https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=95125 Waiver of pre-deposit under Section 35F of the Central Excise Act, 1944 was refused because the direction had been passed in open court in the presence of counsel and the compliance date was also announced there. The appellants neither complied with the deposit requirement nor showed a sufficient basis to secure complete dispensation, so the Tribunal declined to modify the earlier stay order. As the mandatory pre-deposit was not made, the appeal was not entertained and was dismissed for non-compliance. en-us Thu, 23 Nov 2000 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 08 Dec 2011 11:10:56 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=95125 Waiver of pre-deposit under Section 35F of the Central Excise Act, 1944 was refused because the direction had been passed in open court in the presence of counsel and the compliance date was also announced there. The appellants neither complied with the deposit requirement nor showed a sufficient basis to secure complete dispensation, so the Tribunal declined to modify the earlier stay order. As the mandatory pre-deposit was not made, the appeal was not entertained and was dismissed for non-compliance. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 23 Nov 2000 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=95125