<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (11) TMI 435 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=95115</link>
    <description>A rectification application on mistake apparent from the record failed because the Tribunal found the earlier order correctly noted that the assessee had sought condonation of delay in filing the declaration under Rule 57T of the Central Excise Rules. On examination of the reply to the show cause notice, the record showed that such a request had in fact been made, so no apparent error existed in the prior finding. The application was therefore liable to be rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 20 Nov 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2011 10:22:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=132174" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (11) TMI 435 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=95115</link>
      <description>A rectification application on mistake apparent from the record failed because the Tribunal found the earlier order correctly noted that the assessee had sought condonation of delay in filing the declaration under Rule 57T of the Central Excise Rules. On examination of the reply to the show cause notice, the record showed that such a request had in fact been made, so no apparent error existed in the prior finding. The application was therefore liable to be rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Nov 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=95115</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>