<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (11) TMI 427 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=95108</link>
    <description>Delay in filing the appeal was condoned on the basis of unrest in the factory and difficulties with the electricity department. The dispute on merits concerned whether gallery length should be included in chamber length for computation of annual production capacity, but the Tribunal noted that the issue had been decided differently by different benches and had already been referred to a Larger Bench. As duty and penalty were not quantified, interim protection was considered appropriate, and the stay petition was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 20 Nov 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Dec 2011 18:35:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=132167" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (11) TMI 427 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=95108</link>
      <description>Delay in filing the appeal was condoned on the basis of unrest in the factory and difficulties with the electricity department. The dispute on merits concerned whether gallery length should be included in chamber length for computation of annual production capacity, but the Tribunal noted that the issue had been decided differently by different benches and had already been referred to a Larger Bench. As duty and penalty were not quantified, interim protection was considered appropriate, and the stay petition was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Nov 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=95108</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>