https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=95102 The Tribunal directed the appellant to deposit specific amounts towards duty within eight weeks despite their financial hardship plea due to closed units. Failure to comply would lead to the vacation of stay and rejection of appeals without prior notice. The Tribunal balanced the financial hardship plea with the case's circumstances, mandating partial pre-deposit while waiving the remaining duty and penalty amounts during the appeal's pendency. Compliance was required by a specified date. en-us Thu, 16 Nov 2000 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 07 Dec 2011 18:17:33 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=95102 The Tribunal directed the appellant to deposit specific amounts towards duty within eight weeks despite their financial hardship plea due to closed units. Failure to comply would lead to the vacation of stay and rejection of appeals without prior notice. The Tribunal balanced the financial hardship plea with the case's circumstances, mandating partial pre-deposit while waiving the remaining duty and penalty amounts during the appeal's pendency. Compliance was required by a specified date. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 16 Nov 2000 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=95102