<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (11) TMI 396 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=95078</link>
    <description>A prima facie case for waiver of pre-deposit may be established where the appellant&#039;s claim is supported by the applicable CBEC circular on depreciation for capital goods in a 100% EOU. The Tribunal noted that the department&#039;s objection was based on the view that March 1996 production was only trial production because of the small quantity manufactured, but the circular directed that the depreciation period runs from the date the capital goods are put into the manufacturing process until their clearance to the Domestic Tariff Area. On that basis, pre-deposit of duty and penalty was dispensed with and recovery stayed pending appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 09 Nov 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Dec 2011 17:06:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=132137" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (11) TMI 396 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=95078</link>
      <description>A prima facie case for waiver of pre-deposit may be established where the appellant&#039;s claim is supported by the applicable CBEC circular on depreciation for capital goods in a 100% EOU. The Tribunal noted that the department&#039;s objection was based on the view that March 1996 production was only trial production because of the small quantity manufactured, but the circular directed that the depreciation period runs from the date the capital goods are put into the manufacturing process until their clearance to the Domestic Tariff Area. On that basis, pre-deposit of duty and penalty was dispensed with and recovery stayed pending appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Nov 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=95078</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>