https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=95074 The Tribunal declined to modify the stay order on the basis of balance sheets produced after the stay hearing, noting that those documents were not before it when the original stay application was decided and that the earlier order had already considered the merits and financial position of the appellant. As no deposit had yet been made in compliance with the pre-deposit direction, the Tribunal only extended the time for deposit by four weeks. The interim stay therefore continued, but the appeal remained pending subject to compliance with the deposit requirement. en-us Thu, 09 Nov 2000 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 07 Dec 2011 16:57:41 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=95074 The Tribunal declined to modify the stay order on the basis of balance sheets produced after the stay hearing, noting that those documents were not before it when the original stay application was decided and that the earlier order had already considered the merits and financial position of the appellant. As no deposit had yet been made in compliance with the pre-deposit direction, the Tribunal only extended the time for deposit by four weeks. The interim stay therefore continued, but the appeal remained pending subject to compliance with the deposit requirement. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 09 Nov 2000 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=95074