https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=95062 The Tribunal upheld the deposit order of Rs. 15 lac and equivalent penalty against the appellants, rejecting their arguments of natural justice violation and financial hardship. Despite discrepancies in the balance sheets, the Tribunal deemed the deposit order just and reasonable, granting only a one-month extension for compliance. The absence of Jabeda Khata was not deemed crucial to the case, as other evidence supported the Revenue's claims. Failure to comply by the extended deadline could result in dismissal of the appeal. en-us Mon, 06 Nov 2000 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 07 Dec 2011 16:20:57 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=95062 The Tribunal upheld the deposit order of Rs. 15 lac and equivalent penalty against the appellants, rejecting their arguments of natural justice violation and financial hardship. Despite discrepancies in the balance sheets, the Tribunal deemed the deposit order just and reasonable, granting only a one-month extension for compliance. The absence of Jabeda Khata was not deemed crucial to the case, as other evidence supported the Revenue's claims. Failure to comply by the extended deadline could result in dismissal of the appeal. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 06 Nov 2000 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=95062