<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (11) TMI 374 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=95058</link>
    <description>Non-consideration of the cross-objections filed in the appeal and the Board circular relied on by the applicants justified rectification, because both materials ought to have been examined before disposal of the matter. The rectification application was allowed, the final order was recalled for fresh consideration, and the appeal was restored to its original number.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 03 Nov 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Dec 2011 16:13:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=132117" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (11) TMI 374 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=95058</link>
      <description>Non-consideration of the cross-objections filed in the appeal and the Board circular relied on by the applicants justified rectification, because both materials ought to have been examined before disposal of the matter. The rectification application was allowed, the final order was recalled for fresh consideration, and the appeal was restored to its original number.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Nov 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=95058</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>