<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (11) TMI 373 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=95057</link>
    <description>Job-work valuation requires assessable value to be determined under the applicable job-work valuation principle rather than by adopting the principal&#039;s sale price on a manufacturer-cum-trader analogy; the demand founded on that valuation basis failed. Advertisement expenditure incurred by the principal cannot be added to assessable value without a legally sustainable basis under the governing inclusion principle, rendering that demand unsustainable. Central Excise duty remains the manufacturer&#039;s liability, and payment by the principal does not by itself discharge it unless the statute or rules expressly permit that arrangement. The impugned order was set aside and the appeal succeeded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 03 Nov 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Dec 2011 15:38:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=132116" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (11) TMI 373 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=95057</link>
      <description>Job-work valuation requires assessable value to be determined under the applicable job-work valuation principle rather than by adopting the principal&#039;s sale price on a manufacturer-cum-trader analogy; the demand founded on that valuation basis failed. Advertisement expenditure incurred by the principal cannot be added to assessable value without a legally sustainable basis under the governing inclusion principle, rendering that demand unsustainable. Central Excise duty remains the manufacturer&#039;s liability, and payment by the principal does not by itself discharge it unless the statute or rules expressly permit that arrangement. The impugned order was set aside and the appeal succeeded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Nov 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=95057</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>