<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (11) TMI 371 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=95055</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Collector&#039;s decision to drop proceedings against the respondents regarding the recovery of short-paid duty on melting scrap. The Tribunal found that the duty demand for the disputed period was time-barred as the show cause notice lacked essential ingredients to invoke the extended period under Section 11A of the Act. The appeal by the Revenue was dismissed due to the lack of evidence supporting mis-declaration allegations and the time-barred nature of the duty demand. The judgment emphasized the necessity of meeting legal requirements for invoking extended periods of limitation and the importance of substantial evidence in excise duty matters.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 03 Nov 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Dec 2011 15:29:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=132114" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (11) TMI 371 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=95055</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Collector&#039;s decision to drop proceedings against the respondents regarding the recovery of short-paid duty on melting scrap. The Tribunal found that the duty demand for the disputed period was time-barred as the show cause notice lacked essential ingredients to invoke the extended period under Section 11A of the Act. The appeal by the Revenue was dismissed due to the lack of evidence supporting mis-declaration allegations and the time-barred nature of the duty demand. The judgment emphasized the necessity of meeting legal requirements for invoking extended periods of limitation and the importance of substantial evidence in excise duty matters.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Nov 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=95055</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>