https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=95051 Conflicting test reports and a discrepancy between declared and actual weight led to reduction of the redemption fine and penalty on import of synthetic waste. The test opinion was treated as equivocal because it described the sample as prime quality while also treating it as waste, and the limited extent of offending goods did not justify the higher monetary burden. Confiscation under Section 111(d) of the Customs Act, 1962 was maintained, but the fine was reduced to Rs. 1,00,000 and the penalty to Rs. 25,000. en-us Thu, 02 Nov 2000 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 07 Dec 2011 15:17:13 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=95051 Conflicting test reports and a discrepancy between declared and actual weight led to reduction of the redemption fine and penalty on import of synthetic waste. The test opinion was treated as equivocal because it described the sample as prime quality while also treating it as waste, and the limited extent of offending goods did not justify the higher monetary burden. Confiscation under Section 111(d) of the Customs Act, 1962 was maintained, but the fine was reduced to Rs. 1,00,000 and the penalty to Rs. 25,000. Case-Laws Customs Thu, 02 Nov 2000 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=95051