<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (11) TMI 361 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=95045</link>
    <description>Imported machinery subject to a post-importation condition under the Import Policy AM 1985-88 was seized after being sold in breach of that condition and confiscated with redemption allowed on fine. The question was whether the redemption fine should be reduced, and the claimed inferior quality of the machines justified interference only to a limited extent. The redemption fine was reduced from Rs. 1,00,000 to Rs. 50,000, while the appeal was otherwise dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 02 Nov 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Dec 2011 15:00:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=132104" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (11) TMI 361 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=95045</link>
      <description>Imported machinery subject to a post-importation condition under the Import Policy AM 1985-88 was seized after being sold in breach of that condition and confiscated with redemption allowed on fine. The question was whether the redemption fine should be reduced, and the claimed inferior quality of the machines justified interference only to a limited extent. The redemption fine was reduced from Rs. 1,00,000 to Rs. 50,000, while the appeal was otherwise dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Nov 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=95045</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>