<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (11) TMI 360 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=95044</link>
    <description>Zinc ash imported for use was not proved to be hazardous waste because the record lacked cogent evidence from the Revenue, while the test report showed substantial zinc content. Prior treatment of similar zinc ash as non-hazardous, along with compliance with import-related conditions and pollution control requirements, supported permissibility of import under OGL. On that footing, confiscation and denial of import permission could not be sustained, and the import was held permissible.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 02 Nov 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Dec 2011 14:59:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=132103" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (11) TMI 360 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=95044</link>
      <description>Zinc ash imported for use was not proved to be hazardous waste because the record lacked cogent evidence from the Revenue, while the test report showed substantial zinc content. Prior treatment of similar zinc ash as non-hazardous, along with compliance with import-related conditions and pollution control requirements, supported permissibility of import under OGL. On that footing, confiscation and denial of import permission could not be sustained, and the import was held permissible.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Nov 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=95044</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>