https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=95042 Where classification depended on conflicting chemical test reports, the affected importer had to be given a fair opportunity to challenge the expert evidence and lead rebuttal evidence. The importer was not barred from questioning the retest merely because it had requested it, and the availability of cross-examination of the Chief Chemist was relevant to testing the opinion. If cross-examination could not be provided, the laboratory had to furnish a responsible note explaining the testing methodology and relevant factors. The matter was remanded for fresh adjudication after both sides were allowed to adduce evidence. en-us Thu, 02 Nov 2000 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 07 Dec 2011 14:53:27 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=95042 Where classification depended on conflicting chemical test reports, the affected importer had to be given a fair opportunity to challenge the expert evidence and lead rebuttal evidence. The importer was not barred from questioning the retest merely because it had requested it, and the availability of cross-examination of the Chief Chemist was relevant to testing the opinion. If cross-examination could not be provided, the laboratory had to furnish a responsible note explaining the testing methodology and relevant factors. The matter was remanded for fresh adjudication after both sides were allowed to adduce evidence. Case-Laws Customs Thu, 02 Nov 2000 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=95042