<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (11) TMI 1169 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=95034</link>
    <description>The Tribunal remanded the case for further assessment based on the cost auditor&#039;s report, allowing the appellant to challenge the findings on the permissible invisible loss in the manufacturing process. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of considering the cost auditor&#039;s report in determining the invisible loss accurately. The appellant succeeded in challenging the enhanced valuation of scrap cleared and rejected ball bearing rings, as the Commissioner&#039;s decisions lacked clear justification and substantial evidence. The case was disposed of, highlighting the necessity for a comprehensive reassessment to ensure a fair and evidence-based decision-making process.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 01 Nov 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Dec 2011 14:10:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=132093" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (11) TMI 1169 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=95034</link>
      <description>The Tribunal remanded the case for further assessment based on the cost auditor&#039;s report, allowing the appellant to challenge the findings on the permissible invisible loss in the manufacturing process. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of considering the cost auditor&#039;s report in determining the invisible loss accurately. The appellant succeeded in challenging the enhanced valuation of scrap cleared and rejected ball bearing rings, as the Commissioner&#039;s decisions lacked clear justification and substantial evidence. The case was disposed of, highlighting the necessity for a comprehensive reassessment to ensure a fair and evidence-based decision-making process.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Nov 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=95034</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>