https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=95023 Continued delay in completing de novo adjudication after an earlier remand justified further judicial monitoring, because the goods had remained under absolute confiscation for a prolonged period and the adjudicating authority had not acted despite prior directions and correspondence. The authority was therefore required to finalise the de novo proceedings within one month of receiving the order. en-us Mon, 30 Oct 2000 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 07 Dec 2011 12:52:11 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=95023 Continued delay in completing de novo adjudication after an earlier remand justified further judicial monitoring, because the goods had remained under absolute confiscation for a prolonged period and the adjudicating authority had not acted despite prior directions and correspondence. The authority was therefore required to finalise the de novo proceedings within one month of receiving the order. Case-Laws Customs Mon, 30 Oct 2000 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=95023