<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (10) TMI 399 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=95010</link>
    <description>Imported batteries specially designed for aircraft use were treated as eligible for exemption under Notification No. 11/97-Cus. despite classification under sub-heading 8506.90 as goods of general use. The deciding test was end-use and design: the product literature showed aircraft-specific use, and Customs was required to assess whether the goods were likely to be used in an aircraft rather than deny benefit solely because they could also fall within a general-use heading. Ownership of an aircraft by the importer supported resolving doubt in favour of the claimed use, and the batteries were accepted as aircraft parts for the notification.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 24 Oct 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Dec 2011 11:57:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=132069" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (10) TMI 399 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=95010</link>
      <description>Imported batteries specially designed for aircraft use were treated as eligible for exemption under Notification No. 11/97-Cus. despite classification under sub-heading 8506.90 as goods of general use. The deciding test was end-use and design: the product literature showed aircraft-specific use, and Customs was required to assess whether the goods were likely to be used in an aircraft rather than deny benefit solely because they could also fall within a general-use heading. Ownership of an aircraft by the importer supported resolving doubt in favour of the claimed use, and the batteries were accepted as aircraft parts for the notification.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Oct 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=95010</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>