<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (10) TMI 381 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=94992</link>
    <description>Laundry soaps made by an individually owned proprietary unit did not fall within Tariff Entry 3401.13, because that entry was confined to soaps produced by a factory owned by the Khadi and Village Industries Commission or by an organisation approved by it. The unit also failed to qualify for exemption under Notification No. 88/88-C.E., as the notification covered specified rural-area units such as registered co-operative societies, women&#039;s societies, recognised institutions, and DRDA-assisted units; the term &quot;institutions&quot; was read in line with those categories and not extended to an individual proprietor. Trade Notice No. 2/96, which dealt only with the meaning of &quot;rural area,&quot; did not assist the unit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Oct 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2011 12:58:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=132051" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (10) TMI 381 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=94992</link>
      <description>Laundry soaps made by an individually owned proprietary unit did not fall within Tariff Entry 3401.13, because that entry was confined to soaps produced by a factory owned by the Khadi and Village Industries Commission or by an organisation approved by it. The unit also failed to qualify for exemption under Notification No. 88/88-C.E., as the notification covered specified rural-area units such as registered co-operative societies, women&#039;s societies, recognised institutions, and DRDA-assisted units; the term &quot;institutions&quot; was read in line with those categories and not extended to an individual proprietor. Trade Notice No. 2/96, which dealt only with the meaning of &quot;rural area,&quot; did not assist the unit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Oct 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=94992</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>