<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (10) TMI 358 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=94971</link>
    <description>Where the governing Ministry&#039;s order on deemed Modvat credit for a small-scale unit after crossing the aggregate clearance limit was reasonably capable of two interpretations, a referable question of law arose. The legal position was treated as unclear on the availability of credit beyond the specified threshold, so the High Court&#039;s consideration was required. The application for reference was therefore allowed, without deciding the underlying entitlement to credit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Oct 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2011 12:02:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=132030" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (10) TMI 358 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=94971</link>
      <description>Where the governing Ministry&#039;s order on deemed Modvat credit for a small-scale unit after crossing the aggregate clearance limit was reasonably capable of two interpretations, a referable question of law arose. The legal position was treated as unclear on the availability of credit beyond the specified threshold, so the High Court&#039;s consideration was required. The application for reference was therefore allowed, without deciding the underlying entitlement to credit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Oct 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=94971</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>