<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (10) TMI 348 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=94961</link>
    <description>In a valuation dispute, the tribunal granted waiver of pre-deposit and stayed recovery of penalty because the alleged suppression in sales to a related company was not established at the interim stage. The appellant had disclosed the proposed transfer arrangement to the department, and completion of the transfer depended on statutory approval, including clearance under Section 269C of the Income-tax Act, 1961. On those facts, the department&#039;s assumption of immediate transfer and concealment was found to be prima facie doubtful, and the penalty issue was not treated as clear-cut for interim relief purposes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 12 Oct 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2011 11:29:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=132020" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (10) TMI 348 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=94961</link>
      <description>In a valuation dispute, the tribunal granted waiver of pre-deposit and stayed recovery of penalty because the alleged suppression in sales to a related company was not established at the interim stage. The appellant had disclosed the proposed transfer arrangement to the department, and completion of the transfer depended on statutory approval, including clearance under Section 269C of the Income-tax Act, 1961. On those facts, the department&#039;s assumption of immediate transfer and concealment was found to be prima facie doubtful, and the penalty issue was not treated as clear-cut for interim relief purposes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Oct 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=94961</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>