<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (10) TMI 341 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=94954</link>
    <description>Delay in filing the appeal was excused because the appellant&#039;s proprietor had suffered serious illness and had been advised complete rest until recovery. The medical certificate was accepted as supporting the explanation, and the delay was treated as satisfactorily explained. On that basis, the delay was condoned and the application was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 10 Oct 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2011 10:57:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=132013" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (10) TMI 341 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=94954</link>
      <description>Delay in filing the appeal was excused because the appellant&#039;s proprietor had suffered serious illness and had been advised complete rest until recovery. The medical certificate was accepted as supporting the explanation, and the delay was treated as satisfactorily explained. On that basis, the delay was condoned and the application was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Oct 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=94954</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>