<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (10) TMI 339 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=94952</link>
    <description>Modvat credit on duty-paid inputs used in the manufacture of engines could be utilised against duty on motor vehicles cleared from the same factory. The scheme was read as allowing credit for inputs used in or in relation to manufacture, and no rule required one-to-one correlation between a particular input and a specific finished product. The use of the word &quot;intended&quot; supported taking credit on receipt of the input and using accumulated credit later against duty on final products. The article states that departmental guidance also recognised this position, making objections, demands, and penalties unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 10 Oct 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2011 10:54:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=132011" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (10) TMI 339 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=94952</link>
      <description>Modvat credit on duty-paid inputs used in the manufacture of engines could be utilised against duty on motor vehicles cleared from the same factory. The scheme was read as allowing credit for inputs used in or in relation to manufacture, and no rule required one-to-one correlation between a particular input and a specific finished product. The use of the word &quot;intended&quot; supported taking credit on receipt of the input and using accumulated credit later against duty on final products. The article states that departmental guidance also recognised this position, making objections, demands, and penalties unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Oct 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=94952</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>