https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=94949 A revenue appeal could not be proceeded with where it was filed without the Order-in-Original, despite repeated directions to produce the required papers, and without the Commissioner's authorisation required under Section 35B of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The procedural defaults meant the appeal did not satisfy the filing requirements for admission or further consideration, and dismissal under Rule 11 of the CEGAT (Procedure) Rules, 1982 was warranted. The appeal was accordingly dismissed for non-compliance with the prescribed filing formalities and absence of proper authorisation. en-us Fri, 06 Oct 2000 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 06 Dec 2011 10:40:38 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=94949 A revenue appeal could not be proceeded with where it was filed without the Order-in-Original, despite repeated directions to produce the required papers, and without the Commissioner's authorisation required under Section 35B of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The procedural defaults meant the appeal did not satisfy the filing requirements for admission or further consideration, and dismissal under Rule 11 of the CEGAT (Procedure) Rules, 1982 was warranted. The appeal was accordingly dismissed for non-compliance with the prescribed filing formalities and absence of proper authorisation. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 06 Oct 2000 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=94949