<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (9) TMI 471 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=94932</link>
    <description>The Revenue sought rectification of a mistake in the Final Order regarding the classification issue, leading to the Tribunal reopening the matter for a fresh hearing. The discrepancy between goods received and those described in duty paying documents impacted the entitlement to credit, emphasizing the importance of accurate documentation. Despite arguments against a review, the Tribunal decided to reconsider the case comprehensively, focusing on the proper consideration of facts and evidence. This led to the decision to recall the earlier order and schedule a new hearing for a more thorough examination of the case details.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Sep 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2011 18:32:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=131991" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (9) TMI 471 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=94932</link>
      <description>The Revenue sought rectification of a mistake in the Final Order regarding the classification issue, leading to the Tribunal reopening the matter for a fresh hearing. The discrepancy between goods received and those described in duty paying documents impacted the entitlement to credit, emphasizing the importance of accurate documentation. Despite arguments against a review, the Tribunal decided to reconsider the case comprehensively, focusing on the proper consideration of facts and evidence. This led to the decision to recall the earlier order and schedule a new hearing for a more thorough examination of the case details.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Sep 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=94932</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>