<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (9) TMI 468 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=94929</link>
    <description>A revised customs classification cannot be finally sustained where the manufacturer was not given a fair opportunity to meet that basis; the matter must be reconsidered after both sides are heard and a speaking order is passed on the material in the show cause notice. A finding that suppression and misstatement were not established must also rest on adequate grounds and evidence; where the record is insufficient, that conclusion is unsustainable and requires re-examination.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 28 Sep 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2011 18:24:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=131988" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (9) TMI 468 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=94929</link>
      <description>A revised customs classification cannot be finally sustained where the manufacturer was not given a fair opportunity to meet that basis; the matter must be reconsidered after both sides are heard and a speaking order is passed on the material in the show cause notice. A finding that suppression and misstatement were not established must also rest on adequate grounds and evidence; where the record is insufficient, that conclusion is unsustainable and requires re-examination.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Sep 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=94929</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>