<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (9) TMI 455 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=94915</link>
    <description>The Tribunal granted the appellants total waiver from pre-deposit and stayed the recovery of the differential duty amount until the appeal&#039;s final disposal. The decision was based on conflicting decisions by the Northern and Southern Benches of CEGAT regarding the inclusion of gallery length in annual capacity determination, following the precedent set in EID Parry (I) Ltd. case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 Sep 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2011 17:38:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=131974" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (9) TMI 455 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=94915</link>
      <description>The Tribunal granted the appellants total waiver from pre-deposit and stayed the recovery of the differential duty amount until the appeal&#039;s final disposal. The decision was based on conflicting decisions by the Northern and Southern Benches of CEGAT regarding the inclusion of gallery length in annual capacity determination, following the precedent set in EID Parry (I) Ltd. case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Sep 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=94915</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>