<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (9) TMI 446 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=94906</link>
    <description>Repeated failure to cure a registry defect in filing the requisite number of copies justified dismissal of the departmental appeals. The deficiency remained uncured for a prolonged period despite notice, further notice, and an adjournment, and the appellant did not comply with the applicable procedural requirement. In these circumstances, no further adjournment was warranted and the request for continued indulgence was rejected. The appeals were dismissed for non-compliance with the procedural rules governing filing requirements.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 19 Sep 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2011 17:13:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=131965" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (9) TMI 446 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=94906</link>
      <description>Repeated failure to cure a registry defect in filing the requisite number of copies justified dismissal of the departmental appeals. The deficiency remained uncured for a prolonged period despite notice, further notice, and an adjournment, and the appellant did not comply with the applicable procedural requirement. In these circumstances, no further adjournment was warranted and the request for continued indulgence was rejected. The appeals were dismissed for non-compliance with the procedural rules governing filing requirements.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Sep 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=94906</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>