<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (8) TMI 510 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=94899</link>
    <description>Modvat credit had to rest on the prescribed invoice and duty-paid documentation, but where the duplicate-copy practice and duty-payment reconciliation required factual verification, the denials were set aside and the matters remanded. Credit on M.S. plates was inadmissible because they did not fall within the relevant capital goods definition, while credit on lab instruments used for testing and quality-control linked processing was admissible as capital goods. The admitted balance of excess credit remained recoverable from the assessee, and penalties were left open for fresh determination after requantification.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 28 Aug 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2011 16:49:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=131958" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (8) TMI 510 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=94899</link>
      <description>Modvat credit had to rest on the prescribed invoice and duty-paid documentation, but where the duplicate-copy practice and duty-payment reconciliation required factual verification, the denials were set aside and the matters remanded. Credit on M.S. plates was inadmissible because they did not fall within the relevant capital goods definition, while credit on lab instruments used for testing and quality-control linked processing was admissible as capital goods. The admitted balance of excess credit remained recoverable from the assessee, and penalties were left open for fresh determination after requantification.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Aug 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=94899</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>