<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1979 (2) TMI 161 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=94865</link>
    <description>The appellant&#039;s appeal to be added as a respondent in Civil Rule No. 57(w) of 1979 was dismissed by the court. The court found that the appellant lacked a direct interest in the subject matter and only had a commercial interest. The Customs Authorities were deemed to have acted within their rights in withholding the release of goods, and the appellant was held to have no locus standi to be impleaded as a respondent. The court emphasized that the appellant&#039;s commercial interest did not warrant his addition as a party in the writ proceeding. The appeal was dismissed without costs, and the application for interim orders was disposed of.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 15 Feb 1979 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2011 14:48:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=131924" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1979 (2) TMI 161 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=94865</link>
      <description>The appellant&#039;s appeal to be added as a respondent in Civil Rule No. 57(w) of 1979 was dismissed by the court. The court found that the appellant lacked a direct interest in the subject matter and only had a commercial interest. The Customs Authorities were deemed to have acted within their rights in withholding the release of goods, and the appellant was held to have no locus standi to be impleaded as a respondent. The court emphasized that the appellant&#039;s commercial interest did not warrant his addition as a party in the writ proceeding. The appeal was dismissed without costs, and the application for interim orders was disposed of.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Feb 1979 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=94865</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>