<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (6) TMI 390 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=94864</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the duty demand confirmation by the Assistant Collector under TI 68 of the Central Excise Tariff, following the reclassification of the product by the Collector (Appeals). The argument regarding non-receipt of show cause notices was dismissed, and the appeal was rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 05 Jun 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2011 14:47:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=131923" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (6) TMI 390 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=94864</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the duty demand confirmation by the Assistant Collector under TI 68 of the Central Excise Tariff, following the reclassification of the product by the Collector (Appeals). The argument regarding non-receipt of show cause notices was dismissed, and the appeal was rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Jun 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=94864</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>