<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (4) TMI 403 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=94859</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that duty paid on plastic components without proper classification should be refunded if collected without legal authority. It emphasized the rights of the assessee in case of incorrect payments and clarified the applicability of relevant provisions of the Central Excise Act. The decision highlighted the importance of legal compliance in excise duty matters and provided clarity on refund entitlement for duties paid without proper authorization.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 18 Apr 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2011 13:44:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=131918" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (4) TMI 403 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=94859</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that duty paid on plastic components without proper classification should be refunded if collected without legal authority. It emphasized the rights of the assessee in case of incorrect payments and clarified the applicability of relevant provisions of the Central Excise Act. The decision highlighted the importance of legal compliance in excise duty matters and provided clarity on refund entitlement for duties paid without proper authorization.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Apr 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=94859</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>