<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (4) TMI 400 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=94856</link>
    <description>Notification No. 49/94-CE allowed duty-free clearance of intermediate goods where the manufacturer held, applied for, or was permitted under the relevant advance licence framework to supply goods for an export-linked entitlement scheme. On the facts recorded, the exporter held advance licences, the supporting units were endorsed in the DEEC books by the licensing authority, the Central Excise authorities issued CT-2 certificates, and the removals were reflected in RT-12 returns. As there was no allegation of clandestine removal or misappropriation, the condition in the notification was treated as satisfied and the duty demand and penalties were held unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 11 Apr 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2011 13:41:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=131915" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (4) TMI 400 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=94856</link>
      <description>Notification No. 49/94-CE allowed duty-free clearance of intermediate goods where the manufacturer held, applied for, or was permitted under the relevant advance licence framework to supply goods for an export-linked entitlement scheme. On the facts recorded, the exporter held advance licences, the supporting units were endorsed in the DEEC books by the licensing authority, the Central Excise authorities issued CT-2 certificates, and the removals were reflected in RT-12 returns. As there was no allegation of clandestine removal or misappropriation, the condition in the notification was treated as satisfied and the duty demand and penalties were held unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Apr 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=94856</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>