<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (4) TMI 399 - CEGAT,  CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=94855</link>
    <description>Rule 57F(3) uses the term &quot;similar&quot; in a broad sense: it is not confined to identical goods, but extends to goods falling within the same class or category. On that construction, Modvat credit taken on inputs used for export of calcined alumina under bond could be utilised towards duty on aluminium articles, because both were treated as broadly comparable products in the same product group. The objection based on different tariff headings was rejected, and the demand was set aside with consequential relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Apr 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2011 13:37:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=131914" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (4) TMI 399 - CEGAT,  CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=94855</link>
      <description>Rule 57F(3) uses the term &quot;similar&quot; in a broad sense: it is not confined to identical goods, but extends to goods falling within the same class or category. On that construction, Modvat credit taken on inputs used for export of calcined alumina under bond could be utilised towards duty on aluminium articles, because both were treated as broadly comparable products in the same product group. The objection based on different tariff headings was rejected, and the demand was set aside with consequential relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Apr 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=94855</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>