<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (2) TMI 479 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=94839</link>
    <description>Mounting duty-paid carbide tool tips on steel shanks by brazing, followed by grinding to customer specifications, was treated as manufacture because the resulting brazed carbide-tipped tools were commercially distinct from the purchased tips. A circular on grinding unground tool tips did not apply to this process, as it covered only actual users grinding unground tips in their own factories before mounting them. Non-disclosure of the brazing activity in classification lists amounted to wilful misstatement with intent to evade duty, so the extended limitation period was available. Confiscation of land and building was, however, found unjustified and was set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 28 Feb 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2011 12:10:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=131898" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (2) TMI 479 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=94839</link>
      <description>Mounting duty-paid carbide tool tips on steel shanks by brazing, followed by grinding to customer specifications, was treated as manufacture because the resulting brazed carbide-tipped tools were commercially distinct from the purchased tips. A circular on grinding unground tool tips did not apply to this process, as it covered only actual users grinding unground tips in their own factories before mounting them. Non-disclosure of the brazing activity in classification lists amounted to wilful misstatement with intent to evade duty, so the extended limitation period was available. Confiscation of land and building was, however, found unjustified and was set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Feb 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=94839</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>