<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (10) TMI 421 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=94801</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals, emphasizing the importance of considering previous adjudication orders, ensuring compliance with directives, and avoiding unnecessary remands when issues have already been conclusively addressed by senior authorities. The judgment highlighted the need for consistency and thorough examination of facts in excise duty cases to uphold the principles of natural justice and fair adjudication.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 07 Oct 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Dec 2011 18:24:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=131860" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (10) TMI 421 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=94801</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals, emphasizing the importance of considering previous adjudication orders, ensuring compliance with directives, and avoiding unnecessary remands when issues have already been conclusively addressed by senior authorities. The judgment highlighted the need for consistency and thorough examination of facts in excise duty cases to uphold the principles of natural justice and fair adjudication.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Oct 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=94801</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>