<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (9) TMI 508 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=94794</link>
    <description>Modvat credit was held admissible on the disputed cables, wires, sensors and power supply units because they were used in or in relation to manufacture. The Larger Bench view already supported admissibility for cables and wires, and the remaining items were found essential for temperature and pressure control in the manufacturing process. On that reasoning, process-control equipment forming part of manufacture qualified for Modvat credit, and the department&#039;s challenge failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 Sep 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Dec 2011 18:03:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=131853" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (9) TMI 508 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=94794</link>
      <description>Modvat credit was held admissible on the disputed cables, wires, sensors and power supply units because they were used in or in relation to manufacture. The Larger Bench view already supported admissibility for cables and wires, and the remaining items were found essential for temperature and pressure control in the manufacturing process. On that reasoning, process-control equipment forming part of manufacture qualified for Modvat credit, and the department&#039;s challenge failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Sep 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=94794</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>